Rich mans toys and other alternatives to spending you dosh
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:22 pm
I was wondering if we can have rich mans toys?
By this I mean that in real life to prove your wealth the rich me n of this world want to show the kudos via other means other than business.
ie Roman Abramovich owns chelsea FC, The Qatar royal family (via a subsidary and a holding company) own Man city, Tony Fernandes owns a F1 team, I think a saudi prince owns a racing boat team, Glazer family own man utd and i'm sure plenty of rich men with huge companys in the states own basketball, baseball, american football, ice hockey and soccer teams ect.
My point been rich men like to prove outside of there buisness how good they are and how much money they have.
Please, please, please introduce away of spending the cash you have on other things outside of mansions and business.
I've completed Cap 2 several times and have started again aquiring huge amounts of wealth but with no real way of showing it off. I appreciate that there will be coding involved but there must be some way of spending it outside of the business part of the game.
Basically the more you fund the better you do but you could make it relative to the local ownership and to the computer and/or human players. Ie if I spent 1 billion a year on a football team but the computer spent more and then added more teams, then they would win the league more for example. I'm not talking creating a league and i'm not talking creating loads of football teams in one city just say one or two. London has at least 3 big premeriship football teams but has god knows how many outside of that. Manchester has 2 major football teams. New york has 2 major american football franchises. LA had 2 at one stage, you could do it per size of city if you wish or just let the AI and human make ones, Money dosen't buy you leagues but it does help.
F1 and indy teams hemerage money but the Kudos is amazing. You could fund hospitals, schools, universarys, drug clinics, social housing for your workers. Cadburys in the early 20th century built houses, schools and churches just for its workers. Infact 20 years ago my first company that I worked for had bought an entire housing estate for it's workers that it rented out at cost price. Most workers never left dispite having lower wages than the competitor because of the cheap but nice houses. Also financially they would be no better off once the accomadation was taken into account.
I think a game called Detroit (Car manufactorer game) offered ralling, F1 and touring car racing and all it did was looked at the money you spent and the several factors about the cars you made. Cap 2 has car building so it would be nice to have ralling, touring cars and F1 as away of showing your car ability and your own money. ( Not Vital )
I always look forward to comment on my posts, so don't just view comment. Let the boys that have the ability to introduce this sort of thing know the score, as if they don't think theres a reason or want, then they have no reason to implement. Would you spend money implementing something if you didn't think that it was a popular idea?
Look forward to your views and comments
By this I mean that in real life to prove your wealth the rich me n of this world want to show the kudos via other means other than business.
ie Roman Abramovich owns chelsea FC, The Qatar royal family (via a subsidary and a holding company) own Man city, Tony Fernandes owns a F1 team, I think a saudi prince owns a racing boat team, Glazer family own man utd and i'm sure plenty of rich men with huge companys in the states own basketball, baseball, american football, ice hockey and soccer teams ect.
My point been rich men like to prove outside of there buisness how good they are and how much money they have.
Please, please, please introduce away of spending the cash you have on other things outside of mansions and business.
I've completed Cap 2 several times and have started again aquiring huge amounts of wealth but with no real way of showing it off. I appreciate that there will be coding involved but there must be some way of spending it outside of the business part of the game.
Basically the more you fund the better you do but you could make it relative to the local ownership and to the computer and/or human players. Ie if I spent 1 billion a year on a football team but the computer spent more and then added more teams, then they would win the league more for example. I'm not talking creating a league and i'm not talking creating loads of football teams in one city just say one or two. London has at least 3 big premeriship football teams but has god knows how many outside of that. Manchester has 2 major football teams. New york has 2 major american football franchises. LA had 2 at one stage, you could do it per size of city if you wish or just let the AI and human make ones, Money dosen't buy you leagues but it does help.
F1 and indy teams hemerage money but the Kudos is amazing. You could fund hospitals, schools, universarys, drug clinics, social housing for your workers. Cadburys in the early 20th century built houses, schools and churches just for its workers. Infact 20 years ago my first company that I worked for had bought an entire housing estate for it's workers that it rented out at cost price. Most workers never left dispite having lower wages than the competitor because of the cheap but nice houses. Also financially they would be no better off once the accomadation was taken into account.
I think a game called Detroit (Car manufactorer game) offered ralling, F1 and touring car racing and all it did was looked at the money you spent and the several factors about the cars you made. Cap 2 has car building so it would be nice to have ralling, touring cars and F1 as away of showing your car ability and your own money. ( Not Vital )
I always look forward to comment on my posts, so don't just view comment. Let the boys that have the ability to introduce this sort of thing know the score, as if they don't think theres a reason or want, then they have no reason to implement. Would you spend money implementing something if you didn't think that it was a popular idea?
Look forward to your views and comments